Sunday, December 17, 2017

For All You Star Wars Heads

For your prayerful consideration: 
This is food for thought. I am not advocating against seeing the Star Wars films, I am simply offering this bit of insight that was given to me. I am sure at some point I will add some prayerful insights. 

Daniel 11:38
But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.

This next qoute is taken from The Aquarian Gospel Of Jesus Christ, which paints an anti-biblical view of Christ: 

"The Christ is son, the only son begotten by Almighty God, the God of Force and God omniscient, God of thought; and Christ is God, the God of Love."
Dowling, Levi H.. The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ (p. 3). Neeland Media LLC. Kindle Edition. 

The verse in Daniel is equated to the anti-Christ himself. So much more can be added and said, but at the very least, the "Force" is anti-biblical, anti-Christ and is honored by those who don't hold to a biblical view of God. 

Wednesday, November 15, 2017



In spite of it all, Christ is still Lord and Savior!

Ephesians 6:9

And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him.

1 Peter 4:17
For the time is come that judgment 
[Greek: krimacondemnation, damnation]
must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?

George Rekers, Anti-Gay Activist, Caught With Male Escort ‘Rentboy’ 

George Rekers and "Lucien" at Miami International Airport.

George Alan Rekers, a prominent anti-gay activist who co-founded the conservative Family Research Council, was caught returning from a 10-day trip to Europe with a male escort he found on Rent boy, which is exactly what it sounds like.
"George Alan Rekers, of North Miami — the callboy's client and, as it happens, one of America's most prominent anti-gay activists. Rekers, a Baptist minister who is a leading scholar for the Christian right, left the terminal with his gay escort."

Founder of Florida's Biggest Megachurch Accused of Molesting a 4-Year-Old

Bob Coy founded Calvary Chapel Fort Lauderdale and turned it into a 25,000-member powerhouse before resigning in disgrace.
Bob Coy founded Calvary Chapel Fort Lauderdale and turned it into a 25,000-member powerhouse before resigning in disgrace

"The call came from California. A woman told Coral Springs Police she had recently learned something terrible: A South Florida man had molested her daughter for years. It began when the girl was just 4 years old. An officer noted the information and called the victim, who was then a teenager. She confirmed the story in stomach-churning detail."
Coy hosted everyone from George W. Bush to Benjamin Netanyahu. With a sitcom dad's wholesome looks, a standup comedian's snappy timing, and an unlikely redemption tale of ditching a career managing Vegas strip clubs to find Jesus, Coy had become a Christian TV and radio superstar. But then, in April 2014, he resigned in disgrace after admitting to multiple affairs and a pornography addiction. Coy shocked his flock and made national headlines by walking away from his ministry, selling his house, and divorcing his wife."
"Documents show that Coral Springs cops sat on the accusations for months before dropping the inquiry without even interviewing Coy. His attorneys, meanwhile, persuaded a judge with deep Republican ties to seal the ex-pastor's divorce file to protect Calvary Chapel Fort Lauderdale from scrutiny."

Churches protected predator, suit says

Two North Idaho churches are accused of concealing and protecting a known child sexual predator who sexually assaulted boys in both congregations, according to a lawsuit filed this week in Kootenai County District Court. Anthony L. Iglesias is serving time in the Idaho State Correctional Institution after being convicted of sexually abusing two Kootenai County brothers in 2003.



America, a Christian Nation? Not likely. Having set morals does not make one Christian, no more than having a dog make you an animal lover. Even Antone LaVey had a value system....
As Christians, take a moment and think about this : 
The political "moral right", "Conservative Christian" Republican Party, is the spearhead for adherence to standing for the "Pledge of Allegiance" and the ostracizing of people who do not stand, and even question the legitimacy of the Republican party bemoaning of it. This is the so called "Christian Right"! When do we EVER read in our Bible, which is supposed to be our measure and standard, Christ stating and standing for anything other than devotion and allegiance to anything other than God the Father and Him?? Even as the Father dealt with His people in the Old Testament, when do we ever read about His accepting anything even bordering on allegiance to a Nation first?
I am angered, ashamed and saddened when I see the name of Christ taken and used to further sinful desires and agendas as those calling themselves by His name, become rabid and venomous at those who cry for justice, fairness and honest dialogue; and those of us who simply say as Christians and children of God, "No! Christ first and foremost!"
How can we cry for allegiance to the value system of a nation where values and morals are always subjective to the elite in power?? Allegiance to the nation is allegiance to the people in power of that nation and that power is Satan.

John 8:41 
You do the deeds of your father

John 8:44 
You are of the Devil as father, and the lusts of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and did not abide in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own, for he is a liar and the father of it.

Ephesians 2:2-3 
.......according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now works in the children of disobedience;  (3among whom we also had our way of life in times past, in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the thoughts, and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.

In other words, the proof is in the pudding!


Luke 8:16-18
 And no one lighting a lamp covers it or puts it under a couch; but he sets it on a lamp stand so that those who enter in may see the light.  17  For nothing is secret that shall not be revealed; nor secret which shall not be known and come to be revealed.  18  Therefore be careful how you hear. For whoever has, to him shall be given; and whoever has not, from him shall be taken even that which he seems to have.

Exodus 26:33b  .... And the veil shall divide for you between the holy place and the Holy of Holies.

Matthew 27:50-51
Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;

The Temple veil protected God's people from the holy presence of God, because of our sin we could not bear his true presence and live. 
The veil represents the separation of us from God because of sin and was meant to protect US and remind us.
With Christ's willing sacrifice of himself on the cross for sin (John 12:27), the separation, through Christ, is removed. Ironically, t
he Prince of this world uses a veil to protect himself and keep himself hidden!
The devil uses a veil and shroud of witchcraft, sorcery and the occult over this nation and the world!


Down to the very images we use and idolize as a nation are all occult related! This nation is steeped in the occult. The way so called patriotic Americans idolize the American Flag and how they cry out to criminalize those who protest or question this Nation; the National Capitol Dome where bills are passed and signed into law, which is  at the very least,homage to pagan gods; the occultic six pointed star of modern day Israel! It's almost become a crime and it sho nuff is taboo to  speak out with a loud voice against merely the symbology of it all!

All of the lies and deception so he can maneuver the chess pieces where he wants/needs them to be.
It's a task to see past the veil for those of us Children of God whose desire is to walk in the truth and light of Christ and His gospel. 

Yet, there are many, so very many who call themselves Christian, who willingly walk in the darkness that masquerades as light!
Then, there are those who don't know Christ, who are blinded by the darkness, the sins of their heart and those who are the spirit of anti-Christ for a myriad of reasons. Some who allow themselves to be duped into watching and judging spiritual and biblical truth by those who say and claim they are Christians and those who purport to be people of God, but are really agents and vessels of Satan and the true anti-Christ whose purpose is to deceive. 
My belief, based on years of prayer, spiritual discernment and research, is that the spirit of the anti-Christ, uses spells, incantations and occultic items and symbols placed in strategic locations in this nation (and world)to strengthen his influence, deception and grip in this nation and over people's hearts, minds and thereby their souls! Items like Cleopatra's Needle, National Monument/Obelisk, the way the nations Capital's street are paved (although some say the streets don't exactly connect into a pentagram, it's way too close and it's about symbolism and what its meant to represent), the Capitol Dome (why is the inside a monument to Roman gods/goddesses with George Washington as the head, if He and this Nation are dedicated to Christ?), the White House and it's Masonic dedication (why not have it dedicated by Christians and pastors?)The Bohemian Grove, on and on it goes! 
The goddess Minerva, "Virgin goddess of poetry, medicine, wisdom, strategic warfare, commerce, weaving, and the crafts", who is featured inside the Dome, is represented by the Owl (the same as the street layout of the Capital building of Washington District of Columbia and the symbol of the Bohemian Grove), is referred to as being a part of The Capitoline Triad . Even the Statue of Freedom that sits atop the capital dome, has the exact same traits and qualities as Minerva! Indeed, the Wiki page has this to say: 
"A monumental statue for the top of the national Capitol appeared in architect Thomas U. Walter's (also a Freemason) original drawing for the new cast-iron dome, which was authorized in 1855. Walter's drawing showed the outline of a statue representing the Goddess of Liberty"
"The ancient Roman goddess Libertas was honored during the second Punic War by a temple erected on the Aventine Hill in Rome by the father of Tiberius Gracchus. A statue in her honor also was raised by Clodius on the site of Marcus Tullius Cicero's house after it had been razed. The figure bears certain resemblances to Sol Invictus, the late Roman Republic sun deity and the crown often associated with that deity often appears in modern depictions of Liberty."
FYI: The Aventine Hill is one of the Seven Hills Of Rome, as is the Capitoline Hill, which was also the temple of Jupiter, Minerva's father! I can't make this stuff up!

Why would a self proclaimed Protestant  base a design on a pagan goddess? Why would a Christian nation accept this, even if it was renamed? "A rose by any other name...."

Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Whose Approval?

John 7:24  Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
It matters not how low Trumps approval ratings are, as long as the top elite in this nation (and world) approve and support. Do you REALLY think Trump cares if the average everyday Joe and Jane type worker approve of him? Are we so arrogant in ourselves to further think he cares if Blacks and Latinos "approve"?
Have you not been witnessing and observing how this man treats those he says he CARES for and LIKES??

So, The question is: "Whose approval are YOU looking for?"
Galatians 1:10  For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.

Sunday, October 15, 2017


Is being a good parent for only 60 seconds a day sufficient for claims of good parentship? Can claiming an hour a week in church sufficient for claims of good Christianship? Can simply paying attention to your boss or stockholders for a minute a day sufficient enough to claim good employee-ship? What about being mindful in our spending for a minute a day? Is this sufficient for claims of good stewardship?
Why do we allow ourselves to be duped into this false battle and lying, deceptive mindset that simply not standing during a pledge of allegiance sufficient merits of false accusations of "disrespect of our nation and military"?
Why is this mean and hateful heart and mindset typically and uniquely white republican and more sadly, "Evangelical"?
Is truth uniquely partisan and along racial and economic lines?
More importantly if we claim the Jesus Christ of the Bible as our Lord and Savior and America as a "Christian Nation" (meaning we claim Jesus Christ and God as He has revealed Himself to us through the Bible as our measure) what does it mean when God says He is no respecter of persons? (Acts 10:34-35)
Now, here is the measure of pride and sin: Kneeling has always been the symbol of utter submission. I would NEVER kneel. Only in sinful thinking would kneeling before or for something considered not submissive. Why? Because the devil  wants what he says to be taken as truth, when it's actually the utter and complete opposite. Who and what do we honor when we honor falsities and lies?
John 8:44
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Tuesday, September 26, 2017


Rev 13:14-17
14 And he deceives those who dwell on the earth by those signs which he was granted to do in the sight of the beast, telling those who dwell on the earth to make an image to the beast who was wounded by the sword and lived. 15 He was granted power to give breath to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed16 He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, 17 and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or  the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
- With ALL that the President of the U.S.A. has started, incited and proclaimed (lastly and currently the inciting of others against those who do notstand for the National Anthem)and the support that he evidently receives from those who say they are believers in Christ as Lord, how can we not see how close this brings us to what we read in in Rev 13?
I say again, it remains to be seen if Donald Trump is the anti-Christ, but we should be able to see the wheels set in motion and how the anti Christ receives approval and acceptance from false Christians!
Trump proposes those who do not stand for the anthem should be fired, which means "pledge or get no income". Those who support Trump and this anti-biblical rhetoric try to shame those who don't might have strong beliefs against making such a pledge. 

Now, not all who don't want to stand for the pledge are Christians, but ULTIMATELY, when the rubber meets the road, when the time comes for the pledge to be made to the anti Christ and when your source of income, support, healthcare, etc. comes down to your pledging allegance to the anti-Christ and receiving the mark, the ONLY thing that will matter is that you dont do it for the name and cause and allegiance to The one and ONLY Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

Friday, August 11, 2017


 The world's concept of Christianity is all askew because we, as Christians, are (purposefully?) misrepresenting God, Jesus Christ and their relationship with man.  Ultimately it is the devil who orchestrates all of the deception in the world, but we must see our role in being  participants(willing?)and allowing the lie to be perpetuated.
We teach that In the old testament God was vengeful, and in the new, God is all loving and forgiving through Christ. When accepted as a whole and seen as a single book, this is NOT how the bible reads. 
Grace is not some kind of New Testament phenomenon that God decided would work better than His old ways. Christianity literally treats the grace of God like some kind of "plan b" in God's plan of salvation
God's grace is evident all throughout the O.T , beginning with  Adam and Eve as He spares their life after the fall, He doesn't destroy the Jews and Israel as a nation though they regularly practiced sin and pagan worship and time and again He tells them to repent, He is after their hearts and not lip service or sacrifice. God pleads with Israel to stop sinning, He reiterates time and again all of the mercy, grace and blessings He has showed to them throughout their history, yet they knowingly, purposefully and continually CHOSE to follow false gods. 
We also see throughout the O.T where God tells Israel He has REDEEMED them, so redemption is not a N.T concept, only His mode of redemption has changed as it has found it's fulfillment in Jesus Christ. 


Heb 2:1-3
Therefore we ought to give the more earnest heed [we need to pay more attention]to the things which we have heard, lest at any time we should let them slip. 2 For if the word spoken by angels was steadfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward; 3 How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;
Regarding these verses of scripture, Holman NKJV Study Bible Study Note contributor, Malcolm B. Yarnell III, of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, D. Phil., University of Oxford, says this (italics and bold face mine):
"He warned his readers about the dangers of slipping away from participating in the gospel mission by standing on the sidelines as God's plan for history moves forward."
How in the world....??
Even if we treat this verse of scripture as a stand alone, I am at a loss to understand where that explanation comes from. 
Once again, Calvinism forces you to view scripture through its tinted spectacles, and interpret scripture in un-biblical and unsound ways! One odes not come up with or accept  the above comment unless you are already a believer in the false doctrine of eternal security!  
But no verse of scripture stands alone!
The Epistle (or "letter") to the Hebrews is undoubtedly written to Christians. Initially, early Christians who may have been converts from Judaism, but that they were undoubtedly familiar with the Old Testament is a certainty.
However, If there is any doubt the previous verses refer to the possibility of losing salvation,  continue reading this letter to a Christian church (in case we forget or neglect to remember that this is a continuous letter that was not  sectioned off into chapters and verses as we now have):
7 Wherefore (as the Holy Ghost saith, To day if ye will hear his voice, 8 Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness: 9 When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years. 10 Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do alway err in their heart; and they have not known my ways. 11 So I sware in my wrath, They shall not enter into my rest.) 12 Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God. 13 But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. 14 For we are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end; 15 While it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts, as in the provocation. 16 For some, when they had heard, did provoke: howbeit not all that came out of Egypt by Moses. 17 But with whom was he grieved forty years? was it not with them that had sinned, whose carcases fell in the wilderness? 18 And to whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest, but to them that believed not? 19 So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief.

In verse 12, the word translated into "take heed", is translated  "beware" in the NKJV. This Greek word really means to understand, perceive, discern with both our physical and spiritual eyes (understanding).
The Lord lays the case out in black and white so we can biblically and  historically see God's hand in the judgment of His people. Our first reaction should be one of "Oh, I see." 
When we begin to strive to obtain Spiritual discernment, our reaction becomes ones of " OOOOOHHHHHH, now I See!"

The word "departing" in Heb 3:12 means:
from Strong's:
aphistēmi- verb
to remove, that is, (actively) instigate to revolt; usually (reflexively) to desist, desert, etc.: - depart, draw (fall) away, refrain, withdraw self.
Thayer's definition:
to make stand off, cause to withdraw, to remove; to excite to revolt; to stand off, to stand aloof; to go away, to depart from anyone; to desert, withdraw from one; to fall away, become faithless; to shun, flee from; to cease to vex one; to withdraw one's self from, to fall away; to keep one's self from, absent one's self from
The word, meaning and context is exactly the same as in 1 Timothy 4:1:

Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
Luk 8:13
They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away.
In 2 Thessalonian 2:3, The Lord confirms the same warning, but a different word in Greek is used:
2Th 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

falling away:
 from the Greek:
apostasia- noun defection from (the state of) truth, apostasy, falling away, forsake.
apostasy (
total desertion of or departure from one's religion, principles, party, cause, etc..

These are not words synonymous with someone who "never really believed"!
As I always say, you can't forsake a marriage if you were never married to that particular person. How can someone divorce you, if you never knew the person? Neither can you divorce someone with whom you were only pretending to be married to!
"No, judge, we 
 never met, but I want a divorce and financial support!"
The word apostacia, our word for apostasy,  comes from the Greek word for divorce, apostasion
Thayer Definition:
divorce, repudiation, a bill of divorce
The contrast is a simple one when you read the scriptures, utilize a Greek/Hebrew dictionary, and seek His Spirit's guidance in understanding.
 The Old Testament Israel had blessings and curses for their obedience and disobedience. The Lord expected their obedience based on the testimony they received

We, as the true, spiritual Israel, have blessings and judgment based on our obedience and disobedience. However, our disobedience will be judged more harshly because we have a better testimony than the one old testament Israel received. They fell away and did not enter His rest, the then Promised Land, and the same thing applies to us, with the understanding that the rest God is truly talking about is a spiritual one. Salvation

Heb 3:14 
For we are made partakers of Christ, IF we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast unto the end;

God's word is clear, but we ALWAYS allow man and the teachings of demons to muddy it up!
Scripturally it is clear. You can be joined to the Lord, saved, and willingly give up or lose your salvation.
We need to abide in Christ and the faith, and endure in righteousness and obedience from our hearts until the end.
There is no way the 2016 presidential candidates could have received the Christian support that they have, unless people's hearts and minds are not with God in Christ!

If you don't know Jesus Christ, the BIBLICAL Jesus Christ, is it because of how you perceive the actions and/or words of those who call themselves "christians"?
I MUST to tell you, that while that may seem and sound good, God will not accept that as an excuse!
Proverbs 14:12
There is a way which seems right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

 In this age of internet, EVERYONE can have access to the bible (I suggest the King James Version). I think it is the grace and mercy of God,  because of the last days we are living in, access to The Bible is within mostly all people fingertips. He wants all people to have the opportunity to come to Christ, receive His gift of eternal life with Him, and have FULL UNDERSTANDING of His word! God can and WILL give you understanding of HIS word if you will humble yourself and seek His discernment that can ONLY come through HIS Spirit! 
2Peter 3:9  The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

Acts 10:34-35  Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:  (35)  But in every nation he that fear him, and works righteousness, is accepted with Him.
Romans 2:11  For there is no respect of persons with God.
Galatians 2:6  But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it doesnt matter to me: God accepts no man's person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:
1 Corinthians 2:1-5And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not with excellency of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of God.  (2)  For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.  (3)  And I was with you in weakness, and in fear, and in much trembling.  (4)  And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power:  (5)  That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.

I ask you to consider John 3:16-17.
John 3:16-17
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

God wants EVERYONE equally to understand and receive Him regardless of who you are or where you are in life. He gives wisdom, knowledge, peace and strength to all equally so that everyone has the same opportunity to learn of Him and grow in Him! 

James 1:5  If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not [doesn't keep back; and it shall be given him.

So,  if it's the God and Jesus Christ of the Bible you want to understand, then it is to the Bible you must go to understand Him. You can't go to the "god of nature" and ask that spirit(s) to give you understanding of the God of creation, that reveals Himself and His word through the Bible!


No one can deny that Jewish people were the primary targets of the Nazis, nor should one belittle their suffering. But neither should the millions of other victims of the Nazis be forgotten. The same respect and remembrance afforded the Jewish victims should be extended to include the non-Jewish victims as well.

"Hitler became Germany's leader in 1933. By the end of World War II 12 years later, millions of people had been killed in concentration camps, many of them Jews." -
MANY, but not ALL.
"The holocaust inflicted upon European Jews by the Nazi regime was arguably the most systematic and sadistic campaign of mass extermination ever mounted..
Case Study: The Jewish Holocaust, 1933-45

"In the American consciousness the Holocaust has become synonymous with Jewish history. Historical literature of the Holocaust has focused on the six million Jewish victims to the exclusion of the sixteen to twenty million Gentile victims. How is it possible to define an historic event based on the lives of six million Jewish people and not acknowledge the millions more Gentile lives that were also lost? It is understandable that the historiography of the Holocaust emphasizes the Jewish people since they were the single most persecuted group by the Nazis, but why have they become the only focus?
'The genocidal policies of the Nazis resulted in the deaths of about as many Polish Gentiles as Polish Jews, thus making them co-victims in a Forgotten Holocaust. This Holocaust has been largely ignored because historians who have written on the subject of the Holocaust have chosen to interpret the tragedy in exclusivistic terms--namely, as the most tragic period in the history of the Jewish Diaspora. To them, the Holocaust was unique to the Jews, and they therefore have had little or nothing to say about the nine million Gentiles, including three million Poles, who also perished in the greatest tragedy the world has ever known. Little wonder that many people who experienced these events share the feeling of Nobel Laureate Czeslaw Milosz, who anxious when the meaning of the word Holocaust undergoes gradual modifications, so that the word begins to belong to the history of the Jews exclusively, as if among the victims there were not also millions of Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, and prisoners of other nationalities. -- Richard C. Lukas, preface to The Forgotten Holocaust: The Poles under German Occupation 1939-1944'

Bear with me as I try my best to make my point with as much clarity as God gives me. The Nazi holocaust was one of the worst tragedies in our history.
I say "one", because there are many untold millions of victims killed in our present lifetime that barely get a mention in our news media, and if it does it barely registers as more than a blip on the radar of our more popular and accepted news feeds. Statistically (using the more widely held and agreed upon dates, numbers and time, not from minimalists nor an embellished one), the holocaust lasted about 12 years from 1933-1945 in which roughly 5 million Jews were killed. That many lives especially of women and children greatly  pains my heart.
For example; During the 100 dat Rwandan war, there were no Ally Forces, nor an international outcry for a long time, although this brutally fierce, cruel and demonically raged filled atrocity was known by the international governments:

"Genocide in Rwanda

In 1994, Rwanda’s population of seven million was composed of three ethnic groups: Hutu (approximately 85%), Tutsi (14%) and Twa (1%). In the early 1990s, Hutu extremists within Rwanda’s political elite blamed the entire Tutsi minority population for the country’s increasing social, economic, and political pressures. Tutsi civilians were also accused of supporting a Tutsi-dominated rebel group, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF).
Through the use of propaganda and constant political maneuvering, Habyarimana, who was the president at the time, and his group increased divisions between Hutu and Tutsi by the end of 1992. The Hutu remembered past years of oppressive Tutsi rule, and many of them not only resented but also feared the minority.
On April 6, 1994, a plane carrying President Habyarimana, a Hutu, was shot down. Violence began almost immediately after that. Under the cover of war, Hutu extremists launched their plans to destroy the entire Tutsi civilian population. Political leaders who might have been able to take charge of the situation and other high profile opponents of the Hutu extremist plans were killed immediately. Tutsi and people suspected of being Tutsi were killed in their homes and as they tried to flee at roadblocks set up across the country during the genocide. Entire families were killed at a time. Women were systematically and brutally raped. It is estimated that some 200,000 people participated in the perpetration of the Rwandan genocide. 
In the weeks after April 6, 1994, 800,000 men, women, and children perished in the Rwandan genocide, perhaps as many as three quarters of the Tutsi population."
- I am NOT in ANY WAY minimizing the Jewish holocaust death toll, but does the ratio of the Rwandan genocide deaths not at least merit the same type of remembrance as does the death of the Jewish holocaust victims?
800,000 Tutsi were slaughtered, raped and butchered within this hundred day war (this number doesn't include the Hutu or Tutsi sympathizers), what would those numbers be if this went on for 12 years?

By my modest calculations, that would have brought the total deaths to over three million within the first 12 months alone! Statistically, that would be thirty six million within the same 12 year span of time. This is only me playing with the numbers in my head.
 "At the same time, thousands of Hutu were murdered because they opposed the killing campaign and the forces directing it.  
The Rwandan genocide resulted from the conscious choice of the elite to promote hatred and fear to keep itself in power. This small, privileged group first set the majority against the minority to counter a growing political opposition within Rwanda. Then, faced with RPF success on the battlefield and at the negotiating table, these few power holders transformed the strategy of ethnic division into genocide. They believed that the extermination campaign would reinstate the solidarity of the Hutu under their leadership and help them win the war, or at least improve their chances of negotiating a favorable peace. They seized control of the state and used its authority to carry out the massacre.  
The civil war and genocide only ended when the Tutsi-dominated rebel group, the RPF, defeated the Hutu perpetrator regime and President Paul Kagame took control.  
RPF is the The Rwandan Patriotic Front. Although credit, and rightly so, to the RPF is given with the ending of this war, there were also some alleged abuses perpetrated by them as well such as the slaughter of  civilians. Some information is found on the Human Rights Watch site.  
"Although the Rwandans are fully responsible for the organization and execution of the genocide, governments and peoples elsewhere all share in the shame of the crime because they failed to prevent and stop this killing campaign. Policymakers in France, Belgium, and the United States and at the United Nations were aware of the preparations for massive slaughter and failed to take the steps needed to prevent it.
Aware from the start that Tutsi were being targeted for elimination, the leading foreign actors refused to acknowledge the genocide. Not only did international leaders reject what was going on, but they also declined for weeks to use their political and moral authority to challenge the legitimacy of the genocidal government." 
- It's not that the governments couldn't do anything about, the U.N and the international community REFUSED to do anything against the genocide even though they knew it was going to happen. I don't know the time frame, nor the source of their information. I fail to believe, as should the reader, that had the "most powerful Nation in the world" chosen to act (with military bases all around the globe, national diplomats, and the power to rally our "allies")this atrocity would have been exterminated and snuffed out before it had the chance to start.
This is an excerpt form PBS' Frontline 100 Days Of Slaughter, The Triumph of Evil:"The Rwandan Armed Forces (FAR) and Hutu militia (the interahamwe) set up roadblocks and go from house to house killing Tutsis and moderate Hutu politicians. Thousands die on the first day. Some U.N. camps shelter civilians, but most of the U.N. peacekeeping forces (UNAMIR--United Nations Assistance Mission in Rwanda) stand by while the slaughter goes on. They are forbidden to intervene, as this would breach their "monitoring" mandate."
From the same article, this is how the U.S. president at the time, Bill Clinton, responded:
President Clinton speaks to the press about Rwanda-- "... I mention it only because there are a sizable number of Americans there and it is a very tense situation. And I just want to assure the families of those who are there that we are doing everything we possible can to be on top of the situation to take all the appropriate steps to try to assure the safety of our citizens there."
Although this is an excerpt, if it is not a misquote nor taken out of context, he seems to say the only reason for mentioning the war in Rwanda is because there are American there. While Americans should be America's priority, this does not trump the priority of all human lives.  From April 9-10
"France and Belgium send troops to rescue their citizens. American civilians are also airlifted out. No Rwandans are rescued, not even Rwandans employed by Western governments in their embassies, consulates, etc."The Rwandan 100 day war began on April 6th, 1994. Within 4 days, "The International Red Cross estimates that tens of thousands of Rwandans have been murdered.".
April 24th, 1994:"The U.N. Security Council votes unanimously to withdraw most of the UNAMIR troops, cutting the force from 2,500 to 270.
The International Red Cross estimates that tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of Rwandans are now dead."
April 28th 1994:"State Department spokeswoman Christine Shelley is asked whether what is happening in Rwanda is a genocide. She responds,'...the use of the term 'genocide' has a very precise legal meaning, although it's not strictly a legal determination. There are other factors in there as well.'However, a secret intelligence report by the State Department issued as early as the end of April calls the killings a genocide."
I wonder why that is? What could the "legal meaning" that's not  a "legal determination" be that determines if the orchestrated massacre of a people is classified a "holocaust"?
In WTH terminology, she is saying they shouldn't use the word "genocide" to describe the genocide that is going on in Rwanda because genocide is a legal term although it's not a really a legal term.
"Even after it had become indisputable that what was going on in Rwanda was a genocide, American officials had shunned the g-word, fearing that it would cause demands for intervention.."-

"They refused to declare that a government guilty of exterminating its citizens would never receive international assistance. They did nothing to silence the radio that televised calls for slaughter. Even after it had become indisputable that what was going on in Rwanda was a genocide, American officials had shunned the g-word, fearing that it would cause demands for intervention. When international leaders finally voiced disapproval, the genocidal authorities listened well enough to change their tactics although not their ultimate goal. Far from cause for satisfaction, this small success only highlights the tragedy: if weak protests produced this result in late April, imagine what might have been the result if in mid-April the entire world had spoken out." 

Jews were systematically targeted for annihilation by the Nazis (many Nazis were other than German). However, the Jewish people were not the only victims of the holocaust. In all actuality, far more numbers of gentiles were killed than Jews, although not just one type of person as in the Jewish narrative.

Thursday, August 10, 2017

Labels on Cigarettes

Having people admittedly  recognize and acknowledge that, for the worse, the Elite and the Elite of the Elite (Freemason and Illuminati?) hands are in a great many things in our society, and yet we continue on as if we never knew. I compare this to the cigarette smoker, seeing the label on the packaging, acknowledging the validity of it, yet continue smoking with no problem, worries or concerns about it (I am not talking about the smoker who battles with the addiction of nicotine and tries time and again to quit).

"Yea, I see what you mean! Illuminati and Freemason signs are everywhere in building architecture, the lay outs of cities, (not just Washington D.C, either. See Sandusky,Ohio, for another example)movies,videos and performances." "Yup, there goes another one!" "It's simply horrible the way the devil is using the music and movie industry in contributing to the destruction of our society and heavily influencing people, especially kids, for the worse!"

 "I seriously gotta  to stop watching these! Oh, that's my jam right there! Excuse me for a second." 
"Jane, my 6 year old, Joe my 13 year old and Harry my 17 year old, c'mere sit down and watch this new Beyonce video where she is practically naked, gyrating on stage in front of all of these demonic symbols!"
"You know, for the life of me, I can't figure out why Joe and Harry are always pushed up against those girls!" They practically dress like they should be working in a strip club! Come to think of it, One day, I saw Jane dancing like one of those grown hoochies! Where the heck are they getting all of this from? Oh, Dang! That's my other jam! Excuse me again."
"Hey, kids, Harry Potter is coming on and True Blood is coming on after wards! I know how much you like both of those!"
-Wizard Training (seriously)

- An English Man who thinks He is a Vampire, Sleeps In Coffin and Drinks Blood

- Texas Man Claims to Be A Vampire, Bites Woman, Claims to Be Satisfying A Need