Sunday, October 15, 2017


Is being a good parent for only 60 seconds a day sufficient for claims of good parentship? Can claiming an hour a week in church sufficient for claims of good Christianship? Can simply paying attention to your boss or stockholders for a minute a day sufficient enough to claim good employee-ship? What about being mindful in our spending for a minute a day? Is this sufficient for claims of good stewardship?
Why do we allow ourselves to be duped into this false battle and lying, deceptive mindset that simply not standing during a pledge of allegiance sufficient merits of false accusations of "disrespect of our nation and military"?
Why is this mean and hateful heart and mindset typically and uniquely white republican and more sadly, "Evangelical"?
Is truth uniquely partisan and along racial and economic lines?
More importantly if we claim the Jesus Christ of the Bible as our Lord and Savior and America as a "Christian Nation" (meaning we claim Jesus Christ and God as He has revealed Himself to us through the Bible as our measure) what does it mean when God says He is no respecter of persons? (Acts 10:34-35)
Now, here is the measure of pride and sin: Kneeling has always been the symbol of utter submission. I would NEVER kneel. Only in sinful thinking would kneeling before or for something considered not submissive. Why? Because the devil  wants what he says to be taken as truth, when it's actually the utter and complete opposite. Who and what do we honor when we honor falsities and lies?
John 8:44
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Tuesday, September 26, 2017


Rev 13:14-17
14 And he deceives those who dwell on the earth by those signs which he was granted to do in the sight of the beast, telling those who dwell on the earth to make an image to the beast who was wounded by the sword and lived. 15 He was granted power to give breath to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed16 He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, 17 and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or  the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
- With ALL that the President of the U.S.A. has started, incited and proclaimed (lastly and currently the inciting of others against those who do notstand for the National Anthem)and the support that he evidently receives from those who say they are believers in Christ as Lord, how can we not see how close this brings us to what we read in in Rev 13?
I say again, it remains to be seen if Donald Trump is the anti-Christ, but we should be able to see the wheels set in motion and how the anti Christ receives approval and acceptance from false Christians!
Trump proposes those who do not stand for the anthem should be fired, which means "pledge or get no income". Those who support Trump and this anti-biblical rhetoric try to shame those who don't might have strong beliefs against making such a pledge. 

Now, not all who don't want to stand for the pledge are Christians, but ULTIMATELY, when the rubber meets the road, when the time comes for the pledge to be made to the anti Christ and when your source of income, support, healthcare, etc. comes down to your pledging allegance to the anti-Christ and receiving the mark, the ONLY thing that will matter is that you dont do it for the name and cause and allegiance to The one and ONLY Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

Friday, August 11, 2017


 The world's concept of Christianity is all askew because we, as Christians, are (purposefully?) misrepresenting God, Jesus Christ and their relationship with man.  Ultimately it is the devil who orchestrates all of the deception in the world, but we must see our role in being  participants(willing?)and allowing the lie to be perpetuated.
We teach that In the old testament God was vengeful, and in the new, God is all loving and forgiving through Christ. When accepted as a whole and seen as a single book, this is NOT how the bible reads. 
Grace is not some kind of New Testament phenomenon that God decided would work better than His old ways. Christianity literally treats the grace of God like some kind of "plan b" in God's plan of salvation
God's grace is evident all throughout the O.T , beginning with  Adam and Eve as He spares their life after the fall, He doesn't destroy the Jews and Israel as a nation though they regularly practiced sin and pagan worship and time and again He tells them to repent, He is after their hearts and not lip service or sacrifice. God pleads with Israel to stop sinning, He reiterates time and again all of the mercy, grace and blessings He has showed to them throughout their history, yet they knowingly, purposefully and continually CHOSE to follow false gods. 
We also see throughout the O.T where God tells Israel He has REDEEMED them, so redemption is not a N.T concept, only His mode of redemption has changed as it has found it's fulfillment in Jesus Christ. 


Heb 2:1-3
Therefore we ought to give the more earnest heed [we need to pay more attention]to the things which we have heard, lest at any time we should let them slip. 2 For if the word spoken by angels was steadfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward; 3 How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;
Regarding these verses of scripture, Holman NKJV Study Bible Study Note contributor, Malcolm B. Yarnell III, of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, D. Phil., University of Oxford, says this (italics and bold face mine):
"He warned his readers about the dangers of slipping away from participating in the gospel mission by standing on the sidelines as God's plan for history moves forward."
How in the world....??
Even if we treat this verse of scripture as a stand alone, I am at a loss to understand where that explanation comes from. 
Once again, Calvinism forces you to view scripture through its tinted spectacles, and interpret scripture in un-biblical and unsound ways! One odes not come up with or accept  the above comment unless you are already a believer in the false doctrine of eternal security!  
But no verse of scripture stands alone!
The Epistle (or "letter") to the Hebrews is undoubtedly written to Christians. Initially, early Christians who may have been converts from Judaism, but that they were undoubtedly familiar with the Old Testament is a certainty.
However, If there is any doubt the previous verses refer to the possibility of losing salvation,  continue reading this letter to a Christian church (in case we forget or neglect to remember that this is a continuous letter that was not  sectioned off into chapters and verses as we now have):
7 Wherefore (as the Holy Ghost saith, To day if ye will hear his voice, 8 Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness: 9 When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years. 10 Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do alway err in their heart; and they have not known my ways. 11 So I sware in my wrath, They shall not enter into my rest.) 12 Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God. 13 But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. 14 For we are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end; 15 While it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts, as in the provocation. 16 For some, when they had heard, did provoke: howbeit not all that came out of Egypt by Moses. 17 But with whom was he grieved forty years? was it not with them that had sinned, whose carcases fell in the wilderness? 18 And to whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest, but to them that believed not? 19 So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief.

In verse 12, the word translated into "take heed", is translated  "beware" in the NKJV. This Greek word really means to understand, perceive, discern with both our physical and spiritual eyes (understanding).
The Lord lays the case out in black and white so we can biblically and  historically see God's hand in the judgment of His people. Our first reaction should be one of "Oh, I see." 
When we begin to strive to obtain Spiritual discernment, our reaction becomes ones of " OOOOOHHHHHH, now I See!"

The word "departing" in Heb 3:12 means:
from Strong's:
aphistēmi- verb
to remove, that is, (actively) instigate to revolt; usually (reflexively) to desist, desert, etc.: - depart, draw (fall) away, refrain, withdraw self.
Thayer's definition:
to make stand off, cause to withdraw, to remove; to excite to revolt; to stand off, to stand aloof; to go away, to depart from anyone; to desert, withdraw from one; to fall away, become faithless; to shun, flee from; to cease to vex one; to withdraw one's self from, to fall away; to keep one's self from, absent one's self from
The word, meaning and context is exactly the same as in 1 Timothy 4:1:

Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
Luk 8:13
They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away.
In 2 Thessalonian 2:3, The Lord confirms the same warning, but a different word in Greek is used:
2Th 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

falling away:
 from the Greek:
apostasia- noun defection from (the state of) truth, apostasy, falling away, forsake.
apostasy (
total desertion of or departure from one's religion, principles, party, cause, etc..

These are not words synonymous with someone who "never really believed"!
As I always say, you can't forsake a marriage if you were never married to that particular person. How can someone divorce you, if you never knew the person? Neither can you divorce someone with whom you were only pretending to be married to!
"No, judge, we 
 never met, but I want a divorce and financial support!"
The word apostacia, our word for apostasy,  comes from the Greek word for divorce, apostasion
Thayer Definition:
divorce, repudiation, a bill of divorce
The contrast is a simple one when you read the scriptures, utilize a Greek/Hebrew dictionary, and seek His Spirit's guidance in understanding.
 The Old Testament Israel had blessings and curses for their obedience and disobedience. The Lord expected their obedience based on the testimony they received

We, as the true, spiritual Israel, have blessings and judgment based on our obedience and disobedience. However, our disobedience will be judged more harshly because we have a better testimony than the one old testament Israel received. They fell away and did not enter His rest, the then Promised Land, and the same thing applies to us, with the understanding that the rest God is truly talking about is a spiritual one. Salvation

Heb 3:14 
For we are made partakers of Christ, IF we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast unto the end;

God's word is clear, but we ALWAYS allow man and the teachings of demons to muddy it up!
Scripturally it is clear. You can be joined to the Lord, saved, and willingly give up or lose your salvation.
We need to abide in Christ and the faith, and endure in righteousness and obedience from our hearts until the end.
There is no way the 2016 presidential candidates could have received the Christian support that they have, unless people's hearts and minds are not with God in Christ!

If you don't know Jesus Christ, the BIBLICAL Jesus Christ, is it because of how you perceive the actions and/or words of those who call themselves "christians"?
I MUST to tell you, that while that may seem and sound good, God will not accept that as an excuse!
Proverbs 14:12
There is a way which seems right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

 In this age of internet, EVERYONE can have access to the bible (I suggest the King James Version). I think it is the grace and mercy of God,  because of the last days we are living in, access to The Bible is within mostly all people fingertips. He wants all people to have the opportunity to come to Christ, receive His gift of eternal life with Him, and have FULL UNDERSTANDING of His word! God can and WILL give you understanding of HIS word if you will humble yourself and seek His discernment that can ONLY come through HIS Spirit! 
2Peter 3:9  The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

Acts 10:34-35  Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:  (35)  But in every nation he that fear him, and works righteousness, is accepted with Him.
Romans 2:11  For there is no respect of persons with God.
Galatians 2:6  But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it doesnt matter to me: God accepts no man's person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:
1 Corinthians 2:1-5And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not with excellency of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of God.  (2)  For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.  (3)  And I was with you in weakness, and in fear, and in much trembling.  (4)  And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power:  (5)  That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.

I ask you to consider John 3:16-17.
John 3:16-17
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

God wants EVERYONE equally to understand and receive Him regardless of who you are or where you are in life. He gives wisdom, knowledge, peace and strength to all equally so that everyone has the same opportunity to learn of Him and grow in Him! 

James 1:5  If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not [doesn't keep back; and it shall be given him.

So,  if it's the God and Jesus Christ of the Bible you want to understand, then it is to the Bible you must go to understand Him. You can't go to the "god of nature" and ask that spirit(s) to give you understanding of the God of creation, that reveals Himself and His word through the Bible!


No one can deny that Jewish people were the primary targets of the Nazis, nor should one belittle their suffering. But neither should the millions of other victims of the Nazis be forgotten. The same respect and remembrance afforded the Jewish victims should be extended to include the non-Jewish victims as well.

"Hitler became Germany's leader in 1933. By the end of World War II 12 years later, millions of people had been killed in concentration camps, many of them Jews." -
MANY, but not ALL.
"The holocaust inflicted upon European Jews by the Nazi regime was arguably the most systematic and sadistic campaign of mass extermination ever mounted..
Case Study: The Jewish Holocaust, 1933-45

"In the American consciousness the Holocaust has become synonymous with Jewish history. Historical literature of the Holocaust has focused on the six million Jewish victims to the exclusion of the sixteen to twenty million Gentile victims. How is it possible to define an historic event based on the lives of six million Jewish people and not acknowledge the millions more Gentile lives that were also lost? It is understandable that the historiography of the Holocaust emphasizes the Jewish people since they were the single most persecuted group by the Nazis, but why have they become the only focus?
'The genocidal policies of the Nazis resulted in the deaths of about as many Polish Gentiles as Polish Jews, thus making them co-victims in a Forgotten Holocaust. This Holocaust has been largely ignored because historians who have written on the subject of the Holocaust have chosen to interpret the tragedy in exclusivistic terms--namely, as the most tragic period in the history of the Jewish Diaspora. To them, the Holocaust was unique to the Jews, and they therefore have had little or nothing to say about the nine million Gentiles, including three million Poles, who also perished in the greatest tragedy the world has ever known. Little wonder that many people who experienced these events share the feeling of Nobel Laureate Czeslaw Milosz, who anxious when the meaning of the word Holocaust undergoes gradual modifications, so that the word begins to belong to the history of the Jews exclusively, as if among the victims there were not also millions of Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, and prisoners of other nationalities. -- Richard C. Lukas, preface to The Forgotten Holocaust: The Poles under German Occupation 1939-1944'

Bear with me as I try my best to make my point with as much clarity as God gives me. The Nazi holocaust was one of the worst tragedies in our history.
I say "one", because there are many untold millions of victims killed in our present lifetime that barely get a mention in our news media, and if it does it barely registers as more than a blip on the radar of our more popular and accepted news feeds. Statistically (using the more widely held and agreed upon dates, numbers and time, not from minimalists nor an embellished one), the holocaust lasted about 12 years from 1933-1945 in which roughly 5 million Jews were killed. That many lives especially of women and children greatly  pains my heart.
For example; During the 100 dat Rwandan war, there were no Ally Forces, nor an international outcry for a long time, although this brutally fierce, cruel and demonically raged filled atrocity was known by the international governments:

"Genocide in Rwanda

In 1994, Rwanda’s population of seven million was composed of three ethnic groups: Hutu (approximately 85%), Tutsi (14%) and Twa (1%). In the early 1990s, Hutu extremists within Rwanda’s political elite blamed the entire Tutsi minority population for the country’s increasing social, economic, and political pressures. Tutsi civilians were also accused of supporting a Tutsi-dominated rebel group, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF).
Through the use of propaganda and constant political maneuvering, Habyarimana, who was the president at the time, and his group increased divisions between Hutu and Tutsi by the end of 1992. The Hutu remembered past years of oppressive Tutsi rule, and many of them not only resented but also feared the minority.
On April 6, 1994, a plane carrying President Habyarimana, a Hutu, was shot down. Violence began almost immediately after that. Under the cover of war, Hutu extremists launched their plans to destroy the entire Tutsi civilian population. Political leaders who might have been able to take charge of the situation and other high profile opponents of the Hutu extremist plans were killed immediately. Tutsi and people suspected of being Tutsi were killed in their homes and as they tried to flee at roadblocks set up across the country during the genocide. Entire families were killed at a time. Women were systematically and brutally raped. It is estimated that some 200,000 people participated in the perpetration of the Rwandan genocide. 
In the weeks after April 6, 1994, 800,000 men, women, and children perished in the Rwandan genocide, perhaps as many as three quarters of the Tutsi population."
- I am NOT in ANY WAY minimizing the Jewish holocaust death toll, but does the ratio of the Rwandan genocide deaths not at least merit the same type of remembrance as does the death of the Jewish holocaust victims?
800,000 Tutsi were slaughtered, raped and butchered within this hundred day war (this number doesn't include the Hutu or Tutsi sympathizers), what would those numbers be if this went on for 12 years?

By my modest calculations, that would have brought the total deaths to over three million within the first 12 months alone! Statistically, that would be thirty six million within the same 12 year span of time. This is only me playing with the numbers in my head.
 "At the same time, thousands of Hutu were murdered because they opposed the killing campaign and the forces directing it.  
The Rwandan genocide resulted from the conscious choice of the elite to promote hatred and fear to keep itself in power. This small, privileged group first set the majority against the minority to counter a growing political opposition within Rwanda. Then, faced with RPF success on the battlefield and at the negotiating table, these few power holders transformed the strategy of ethnic division into genocide. They believed that the extermination campaign would reinstate the solidarity of the Hutu under their leadership and help them win the war, or at least improve their chances of negotiating a favorable peace. They seized control of the state and used its authority to carry out the massacre.  
The civil war and genocide only ended when the Tutsi-dominated rebel group, the RPF, defeated the Hutu perpetrator regime and President Paul Kagame took control.  
RPF is the The Rwandan Patriotic Front. Although credit, and rightly so, to the RPF is given with the ending of this war, there were also some alleged abuses perpetrated by them as well such as the slaughter of  civilians. Some information is found on the Human Rights Watch site.  
"Although the Rwandans are fully responsible for the organization and execution of the genocide, governments and peoples elsewhere all share in the shame of the crime because they failed to prevent and stop this killing campaign. Policymakers in France, Belgium, and the United States and at the United Nations were aware of the preparations for massive slaughter and failed to take the steps needed to prevent it.
Aware from the start that Tutsi were being targeted for elimination, the leading foreign actors refused to acknowledge the genocide. Not only did international leaders reject what was going on, but they also declined for weeks to use their political and moral authority to challenge the legitimacy of the genocidal government." 
- It's not that the governments couldn't do anything about, the U.N and the international community REFUSED to do anything against the genocide even though they knew it was going to happen. I don't know the time frame, nor the source of their information. I fail to believe, as should the reader, that had the "most powerful Nation in the world" chosen to act (with military bases all around the globe, national diplomats, and the power to rally our "allies")this atrocity would have been exterminated and snuffed out before it had the chance to start.
This is an excerpt form PBS' Frontline 100 Days Of Slaughter, The Triumph of Evil:"The Rwandan Armed Forces (FAR) and Hutu militia (the interahamwe) set up roadblocks and go from house to house killing Tutsis and moderate Hutu politicians. Thousands die on the first day. Some U.N. camps shelter civilians, but most of the U.N. peacekeeping forces (UNAMIR--United Nations Assistance Mission in Rwanda) stand by while the slaughter goes on. They are forbidden to intervene, as this would breach their "monitoring" mandate."
From the same article, this is how the U.S. president at the time, Bill Clinton, responded:
President Clinton speaks to the press about Rwanda-- "... I mention it only because there are a sizable number of Americans there and it is a very tense situation. And I just want to assure the families of those who are there that we are doing everything we possible can to be on top of the situation to take all the appropriate steps to try to assure the safety of our citizens there."
Although this is an excerpt, if it is not a misquote nor taken out of context, he seems to say the only reason for mentioning the war in Rwanda is because there are American there. While Americans should be America's priority, this does not trump the priority of all human lives.  From April 9-10
"France and Belgium send troops to rescue their citizens. American civilians are also airlifted out. No Rwandans are rescued, not even Rwandans employed by Western governments in their embassies, consulates, etc."The Rwandan 100 day war began on April 6th, 1994. Within 4 days, "The International Red Cross estimates that tens of thousands of Rwandans have been murdered.".
April 24th, 1994:"The U.N. Security Council votes unanimously to withdraw most of the UNAMIR troops, cutting the force from 2,500 to 270.
The International Red Cross estimates that tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of Rwandans are now dead."
April 28th 1994:"State Department spokeswoman Christine Shelley is asked whether what is happening in Rwanda is a genocide. She responds,'...the use of the term 'genocide' has a very precise legal meaning, although it's not strictly a legal determination. There are other factors in there as well.'However, a secret intelligence report by the State Department issued as early as the end of April calls the killings a genocide."
I wonder why that is? What could the "legal meaning" that's not  a "legal determination" be that determines if the orchestrated massacre of a people is classified a "holocaust"?
In WTH terminology, she is saying they shouldn't use the word "genocide" to describe the genocide that is going on in Rwanda because genocide is a legal term although it's not a really a legal term.
"Even after it had become indisputable that what was going on in Rwanda was a genocide, American officials had shunned the g-word, fearing that it would cause demands for intervention.."-

"They refused to declare that a government guilty of exterminating its citizens would never receive international assistance. They did nothing to silence the radio that televised calls for slaughter. Even after it had become indisputable that what was going on in Rwanda was a genocide, American officials had shunned the g-word, fearing that it would cause demands for intervention. When international leaders finally voiced disapproval, the genocidal authorities listened well enough to change their tactics although not their ultimate goal. Far from cause for satisfaction, this small success only highlights the tragedy: if weak protests produced this result in late April, imagine what might have been the result if in mid-April the entire world had spoken out." 

Jews were systematically targeted for annihilation by the Nazis (many Nazis were other than German). However, the Jewish people were not the only victims of the holocaust. In all actuality, far more numbers of gentiles were killed than Jews, although not just one type of person as in the Jewish narrative.

Thursday, August 10, 2017

Labels on Cigarettes

Having people admittedly  recognize and acknowledge that, for the worse, the Elite and the Elite of the Elite (Freemason and Illuminati?) hands are in a great many things in our society, and yet we continue on as if we never knew. I compare this to the cigarette smoker, seeing the label on the packaging, acknowledging the validity of it, yet continue smoking with no problem, worries or concerns about it (I am not talking about the smoker who battles with the addiction of nicotine and tries time and again to quit).

"Yea, I see what you mean! Illuminati and Freemason signs are everywhere in building architecture, the lay outs of cities, (not just Washington D.C, either. See Sandusky,Ohio, for another example)movies,videos and performances." "Yup, there goes another one!" "It's simply horrible the way the devil is using the music and movie industry in contributing to the destruction of our society and heavily influencing people, especially kids, for the worse!"

 "I seriously gotta  to stop watching these! Oh, that's my jam right there! Excuse me for a second." 
"Jane, my 6 year old, Joe my 13 year old and Harry my 17 year old, c'mere sit down and watch this new Beyonce video where she is practically naked, gyrating on stage in front of all of these demonic symbols!"
"You know, for the life of me, I can't figure out why Joe and Harry are always pushed up against those girls!" They practically dress like they should be working in a strip club! Come to think of it, One day, I saw Jane dancing like one of those grown hoochies! Where the heck are they getting all of this from? Oh, Dang! That's my other jam! Excuse me again."
"Hey, kids, Harry Potter is coming on and True Blood is coming on after wards! I know how much you like both of those!"
-Wizard Training (seriously)

- An English Man who thinks He is a Vampire, Sleeps In Coffin and Drinks Blood

- Texas Man Claims to Be A Vampire, Bites Woman, Claims to Be Satisfying A Need

Saturday, August 5, 2017


"Nothing happens in politics by accident, if it happens, it was planned that way"
- Franklin D. Roosevelt, circa 1936

Many people, sources and sites claim this quote to be fake at the least and at most a horribly misinterpreted quote.
However, history has proven the veracity of this statement. Does anyone remember the Bush/Gore presidential election fiasco and the infamous Florida recount? This video doesn’t specifically talk about that particular issue, but you will be able to see and judge for yourself how vote tampering is  possible

Former journalist Tim Russert, who dared to question both Bush and Kerry on live t.v about Skull and Bones and secret societies in 2004, dropped dead quite suddenly on the NBC studio set of his show, Meet The Press in 2008. You can read an article from People Magazine here, though the web is replete with articles and reports about his sudden death. It is of interest to note the quote from Pathologist, Dr Cyril Wech, regarding the testimony of Russert’s cardiologist, Dr. Michael Newman:
Wecht said only one thing does not make sense to him – Newman's claim that Russert passed the stress test on April 29 and that he could have passed one an hour before his death. ‘This hardening of the arteries is something that builds up over a period of years,’ said Wecht. ‘So he wouldn't be able to continue the stress test. He'd get short of breath.’ "  
This particular video refers not only to the elite, but also the control of who gets elected. Notice the “as a matter of fact” smugness in Bush’s response. His reply isn’t similar to other tones and rhetoric of all presidential hopefuls and their campaigns, who make seemingly positive affirmations of being the next elected president, sounding very similar to the “name it and claim it” prosperity preachers.

WHO ARE THE ELITE (in my opinion)

Are we so blind and ignorant as to think the powerful elite would leave it to chance that their interests, lifestyles, riches and their power would be assured?
If even the smallest and poorest of communities attempt to form councils and to make sure their interests are heard, preserved, addressed and brought to fruition, why wouldn’t the richest and  most affluent of the worldwide community who stand to lose the most, do the same?  Unfortunately, even within the poorest of communities, it is always the ones with the most money (thereby the most powerful) who it within the best interest of the poor community is to make sure the interests of the rich are fulfilled.
Here is a perfect example:

Sheldon Adelson To Host Secret Anti-BDS Summit for Jewish Donors

"The meeting, taking place this weekend, will be hosted by casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson and was organized by several other top Jewish funders, including Hollywood entertainment mogul Haim Saban, Israeli-born real-estate developer Adam Milstein and Canadian businesswoman Heather Reisman."
"The initiative, in this case, did not come from students on the ground, nor did it emerge from work of the many organizations involved in pro-Israel activism on campus. Instead, it is an idea coming from wealthy Jewish philanthropists who have decided to take action. Their communiqu├ęs to Jewish groups invite them to come and brainstorm with them during a weekend gathering at the Venetian, Adelson’s luxury hotel on the Las Vegas Strip."
The context to which "brainstorm" was used is:
is a group creativity technique by which efforts are made to find a conclusion for a specific problem by gathering a list of ideas spontaneously contributed by its members."
"Come and brainstorm"? Yea, ok. They are billionaires, including Saban, control entire industries,banks, people and politics, and they are going to "brainstorm"?  Not likely. The pro-Israel groups are going to be told what, where, and how to do it. They may brainstorm on what to eat for dinner, but that's not likely. 
What is this "BDS" that has these wealthy and powerful men knickers in a bunch (yes, there is one woman mentioned, but as you will see the wealthiest are the Jewish men)?
 "In 2005, Palestinian civil society issued a call for a campaign of boycotts, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel until it complies with international law and Palestinian rights. A truly global movement against Israeli Apartheid is rapidly emerging in response to this call. "
Please, don't think I am so ignorant as to believe the powerful elite will reach their goal by employing what amounts to probably mostly a bunch of college kids. That is just one of many avenues they are taking:

"Among the overseas organizations monitored by Military Intelligence are dozens affiliated with the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, though groups with the same goals working within Israel are not monitored by the department. Such activity inside Israel was criticized in the past, due to its political connotations.
The BDS movement conducts campaigns aimed at promoting boycotts of Israel and persuading companies to withdraw their investments from the country.
The monitoring of every BDS-linked group is approved in advance by a senior officer in the research division, following a decision not to follow groups which have indirect contacts with Israeli activists."

At this point, this may appear to simply be about politics and a few rich Jewish fat cats. can be controlled    . However, in reality, it is the finances that govern and direct the politics. The more wealth you have, the more you fund politicians  While politicians and people in places of power (or able to have the ear of people in  power) may or may not be totally trusted by the few top elite to truly have their (the elite's) best interests at heart, wealth can also buy information to garner that "trust".

The Power Base

I will be writing, what is solely my opinion,  regarding  the Israel financial and political power base.
Point 1 Fact: America is known worldwide as the worlds most powerful military force. 
Point # 2 Fact: Israel consistently demands America fall in line with it's directives, or else America is no longer "The friend of Israel "or "No closer ally than Israel". All anyone has to do is look at the current headlines. Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu's insists that America bends to it's will. On the surface, it doesn't appear that the current president of the USA is falling in line. It is for this reason why Congress defiantly hosted BiBi without his approval or without inviting him to their little pow wow. The fact that the Republicans could invite and host a head of state without the president, and some even say without his initial knowledge, speaks to the power and weight of Jews and Israel. 
Following, will be some quotes taken from different unbiased sites.
 I pray that at the very least, you will begin to question  the status quo and say "Hey, something is not right about this". 


John 14:6  Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

There is a lot of noise on the internet and in the real world. Stories that are out right lies and half truths,  purposefully pre-occupying your mind and playing on your ignorance and plucking those heart strings. All of this to distract us from what's really going on behind the noise. It's all Smoke and Mirrors, as we used to say.
Don't let media nor people who are under it's influence (they're drinking the kool aid and driving) direct your line of vision.
Having said that, I don't want to be part of the noise, and I think I have been. I have allowed myself to be party of the noise. The noise, behind the noise, if you can understand that. It still takes your mind off the real goal, which is walking and abiding in the Lord, so that you can endure until the end.  I and some Christians, such as myself, have become so focused on looking for the real that is behind the scene, that i have placed more emphasis on that, then preaching the word of God.
That's where and how this ministry started and that's where my focus needs to return to. It's still noise, whether true or not, and it is still the distraction. By the continuation of seeking worldly truth, I have let Satan distract me. Because of that, I am just reproducing the noise, that is distracting others. Now, I am not blind. A true  walk with Christ demands we stay aware of what is going on around us. This is why Christ tells us in Matthew 24 and 25, and in the Book of Revelations what is to the come and the signs of the end:
Matthew 24:3-5
And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?  (4)  And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.  (5)  For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
- Unlike in Matthew 12:38-39 and 16:1-4, where Christ goes off on the Pharisees for seeking a different kind of sign, Christ doesn't reprimand the disciples(Mark  13:3-4 tells us that the disciples were Peter, James, John and Andrew)for asking the question or for wanting to know signs of his return. Christ wants us to know what the heck is really going on. Sometimes, I might say stuff that you may not want to hear, whether it's Christ want's EVERYONE to come to Him:
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Or,  that Satan is behind the scenes (and sometimes not so behind as much as disguised) manipulating events, and there are many all going on simultaneously. Many of you know, when you care about someone, some of the things you may have to tell them can be hard for them to hear, but they are things they need to know to grow. I love the word of God and the truth of His word and I care about people's soul, so I have to say what the Lord has for me to say. Your not liking or accepting it doesn't change truth.
Part of Satan's plan is to put the anti-christ in power, become a physical god in the earth, and to persecute the people of God.
 In John 14:6, Christ says HE is the only way to the father. It will be Christians in particular, and generally, stubborn, strong willed individuals, who do not accept the ant-christ as Lord, who will be persecuted and killed. But the word of God tells us only those who endure until the end in Christ who will get to spend eternity in His presence. It is through Him and the Holy Spirit, that will gives us the best chance at standing against worshiping the anti-christ.
God will ALWAYS give the unsaved a chance to accept Christ, but what happens if you die before that? Do you know where you will spend eternity? Oh, there is eternity, it's just a matter of where you will spend it. The message is the same for those of you who already profess to know Christ. I don't understand how some Christians can think you can live your lives any  kind of way, and still get to be in the presence of The Holy and Righteous One. Read  (just one of many passages) what the bible says about that:

 For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning.  (21)  For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.  (22)  But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.
If you haven't already, accept Christ as Lord and Savior and His substitutionary death on the cross for your sins .
If you are a backslidden Christians, repentance needs to happen before you can be renewed and revived in Christ.
God is loving, but He is also holy and just.

Calvinism: The Artful Christianity

Calvinists adhere to lies and can not be trusted except to preach and teach the anti scriptural, satanic and false doctrine of Eternal Security and Predestination. That is, God randomly picks and chooses who can be saved, and once saved, you can never loose your salvation. One of  their main foundation verse of scripture that they take out of context to support the lie of Eternal Security:
John 10:29  My Father, who hath given them unto me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand.This verse speaks to our assurance as Christians, that no one can take our salvation. we can be assured, because God has obligated Himself, that nothing anybody can do will take away our salvation. Notice the conflict in this verse is not  sin separating us from Christ, but PEOPLE separating us from Christ.

The survival of their theology and doctrine is dependent on them not  preaching and teaching what the BIBLE teaches when it says WHOSOEVER shall come to God shall be saved and Christ died so that ALL can come to Him, and similar verses:John 3:16-17:
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17  For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is long suffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Rev 22:17  
And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let those who understand say, Come. And let those who are thirsty, come. And WHOSOEVER will, let him take the water of life freely.
 ho, hay, to
Strong's Conc.

Strong's Conc.
My next statement is in no way making this post, or letting my belief be shaped by politics (as I find very many do). I do not have or believe in any political affiliation. Yet, I can't help wondering if the majority of the rich, controlling, "right wing" are Calvinists. Not only do they consider themselves the elect financially, socially and politically, it stands to reason their "status" would rollover into their christianity as well, which is not true and biblical Christianity

- The word "whosoever" in Greek is the word "pas
grammatically an adj: it tells us how many believers in Him will not be destroyed:
Strong's Con
all, any, every, the whole: all  always, any, anyone, every, everyone, as many as, whole, whosoever.
2Peter 3:9 
- This "whosoever" is the word:
grammatically: definite article; basically means the word is indicative of the whole:the (children), this (group), that (orchestra), one (team),  he, she, it, (all inclusive) etc. 
Although their false sense of elitism in Election and Predestination, and false sense of security in their doctrine of Unconditional Security, nonetheless, they will initially and rightly preach salvation is for all and anyone who repents of their sin and believes in salvation through Christ Jesus alone  will become saved, they make God and His word out to be a liar as they twist and manipulate scripture to fit their already pre-conceived and established theology,  when what they really believe and later preach that salvation is only for the select and  privileged few. This is also called "Conditional Election". They twist words like all, everyone, and anyone, making them solely exclusive to only those who Gad has already pre-determined, pre-destined and elected to be saved, which are plainly and clearly not the context of the verses. As I have said many times and continue to say, no one who becomes christian and learns to depend on the Holy Spirit for discernment, given a KJV bible ( I am not a KJV only person, but I have found that many other translations will translate words to use a weaker form of the word that does not fit in contextually with the other verses, chapters and message of the Gospel as a whole) and put on a desert island, would be rescued Catholic,Calvinist, Seventh Day Adventist, Jehovah's Witness, Moonie,Unitarian,New Age,or any other group where you would have to have someone teach you a particular doctrine, then interpret for you how to see all of doctrine through that particular established view. In other words, for example, someone would HAVE TO teach you Calvinism first in order for you to see scripture in that particular way.

#Calvinism #false #doctrine #liar #predestination#election #preach #teach #security #whosoever#salvation #Christ #God #Spirit,